2007-08-17 09:07:23 Please stop attributing text that doesn't need to be attributed. This isn't wikipedia; unattributed opinions in article text are welcome. However, what you're attributing isn't even an opinion, which makes what you're doing even more silly. —WilliamLewis
2007-08-17 10:07:19 If you disagree with an opinion on an entry, add your opinion. While Wikipedia works via "NPOV", trying to eliminated points of view, Davis Wiki generally works on "APOV", or Aggregate Point of View, where all editors add different points of view to an entry until it accumulates the various opinions of Davis itself. If you have a different take on something, add it... just try to phrase it so that the varying points of view read well and can be compared to each other by the reader1. —JabberWokky
2007-08-17 10:19:59 I would also add that while Paul harms has no control over the Cal Aggie, he is well informed on their business practices. —JamesSchwab
2007-08-17 10:47:39 I am sure you guys wouldn't object if I presented my own opinion of the Aggie's finances as fact. —SteveOstrowski
2007-08-17 18:05:54 Trust me, I had more influence on the Aggie's budget this year than Peter Hamilton. Don't try to write me off, whoever are. Let me break it down: California Aggie=ASUCD Unit. California Aggie Accounts=ASUCD Accounts. A few more years of Aggie deficits=No more money left in Aggie Accounts=ASUCD obligation to subsidize ASUCD=very very very unhappy ASUCD=what I'm supposed to prevent. —PaulHarms
Footnotes
1. And feel free to ignore this advice... it's just what I've found works well within the wiki
Comments:
You must be logged in to comment on this page. Please log in.